Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts - RGCON 2016
Case Report
Commentary
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Point of Technique
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts - RGCON 2016
Case Report
Commentary
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Point of Technique
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts - RGCON 2016
Case Report
Commentary
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Original Article
Point of Technique
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Abstracts - RGCON 2016
02 (
Suppl 1
); S93-S94
doi:
10.1055/s-0039-1685273

Cervix: Poster Abstract: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus definitive chemo radiation as treatment for localized carcinoma cervix

Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
Department of Surgical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, India
Licence
This open access article is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher.

Abstract

Background:

Cervical cancer is ranked as the most common cancer in Indian women, second most common cancer worldwide and the leading cause of death in the developing countries. In the developing countries majority of the patients are diagnosed at locally advanced stages. The standard treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer is concomitant chemoradiation (CTRT) using platinum based chemotherapy. However, some randomized studies have shown improved results for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by surgical resection in comparison to patient receiving radiation alone. The present study was designed to compare response to the treatment and survival of and NACT followed by radical surgery (RS) with CTRT in the patients of uterine cervix of a tertiary cancer care centre.

Patients and Methods:

Retrospective study was performed in locally advanced/advance stage patients of cervix UTERI registered in the institute between years 2009 to 2013. Patients were included in the two groups, group A consists of 89 patients who have received NACT + RS and 67 patients in group B who have received CTRT. Clinical records were reviewed with particular reference to presenting complaint, clinical stage, response to the therapy, disease free survival and overall survival. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22.

Results:

In the neoadjuvant group (group A) (n=89) the median age of patients was 53 years (range 31-80 years), most of the patients (70%) were presented with complaint of postmenopausal bleeding. Of the total patients, 69 (77.5%) underwent to radical surgery and 5 (8.5%) received radiotherapy after NACT. From 69 patients, who had undergone to surgery, 54 (78.3%) had also received radiation. The overall response to induction chemotherapy was 84%. In the chemo radiation group (group B) (n=65) median age was 56 years (33-75 years). Vaginal bleeding (34%) followed by postmenopausal bleeding (32%) was major presenting complaint in this group. Overall response to the complete treatment was 91%. The median follow up time was 14.3 months in group A and 12.2 months in group B. The disease free survival for NACT group was 32 months (95% CI 26.8-36.5) whereas for CTRT group it was 28 months (95% CI 23.5-33) with 12 and 13 recurrences per group (p = .226). In NACT group overall survival was 46.2 months (95% CI 44-48.3) and for CTRT group it was 38.3 months (95%CI 36.6-40) with 3 and 2 deaths per group (p=.883).

Conclusion:

Present study shows comparable results, with no difference in survival between both the groups. However, NACT + RS group had showed better disease free and overall survival than another group. Further studies should be performed with larger number of patients and longer duration of follow up.


Fulltext Views
161

PDF downloads
53
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections