Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts - RGCON 2016
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Original Article
Point of Technique
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts - RGCON 2016
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Original Article
Point of Technique
Review Article
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Search in posts
Search in pages
Filter by Categories
Abstracts - RGCON 2016
Case Report
Case Series
Commentary
Editorial
Erratum
Letter to Editor
Letter to the Editor
Media & News
Original Article
Point of Technique
Review Article
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
2025
:11;
23
doi:
10.25259/ASJO_27_2025

Clinicopathological profile of gastrointestinal tract malignancies: A retrospective study.

Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Department of Pharmacy Practice, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Department of Gastroenterology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

*Corresponding author: Dr. Bhupendra Singh Chahar, Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Medical Science and Research, Jaipur, 303121, Rajasthan, India. bhupendrachahar1985@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Chahar BS, Bhat GM, Krishna R, Chaturvedi A, Dutti C, Debnath S, et al. Clinicopathological profile of gastrointestinal tract malignancies: A retrospective study. Asian J Oncol. 2025;11:23. doi: 10.25259/ASJO_27_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

Gastrointestinal (GI) tract malignancies are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Most cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, making early detection essential for improving outcomes. This study aimed to examine the incidence, clinical characteristics, and trends of GI cancers in a tertiary care setting, with a focus on age and gender distribution, disease presentation, and metastasis patterns at diagnosis.

Material and Methods:

A retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Medical Oncology over a 2-year period from January 2023 to December 2024, including 178 patients with histopathologically confirmed GI tract malignancies. Data were extracted from medical records and analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

Results:

Among 178 patients, biliary tract cancers were the most frequent (34.26%), followed by cancers of the large intestine (25.28%), esophagus (15.16%), stomach (10.11%), pancreas (8.98%), liver (5.05%), and small intestine (1.12%). The incidence of GI malignancies increased progressively with age; 84% of patients were above 40 years, predominantly in the 41–80 years age group. Males accounted for 57.3% of cases, while females represented 42.7%. The most common presenting symptom was abdominal pain, often associated with weight loss. At diagnosis, 57.86% of patients had localized disease, whereas 42.67% presented with metastatic disease.

Conclusion:

This study highlights the increasing burden of GI tract malignancies in older age groups, with a considerable proportion presenting at advanced stages. Early detection in high-risk populations and greater awareness of early symptoms are crucial to reducing late-stage diagnoses. Public health strategies targeting modifiable risk factors, including dietary habits, tobacco, and alcohol use, are essential to curb the incidence and improve patient outcomes.

Keywords

Cancer distribution
Clinicopathological
Demographic trends
GI malignancies
Staging

INTRODUCTION

Cancer is among the leading causes of premature mortality worldwide and ranks first or second in most countries. Global incidence is projected to double by 2070 compared with 2020 levels.[1] According to Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) 2022, there were 20 million new cancer cases and 9.7 million deaths, accounting for one in six deaths. By 2050, the burden is expected to increase by 77 percent, with low- and middle-income countries disproportionately affected due to inadequate diagnostic and therapeutic capacity.[2]

India contributes substantially to the global burden, ranking third with 1.46 million new cases and 0.92 million deaths in 2022. The incidence rate was 100.4 per 100,000, and projections suggest that one in nine Indians will develop cancer during their lifetime. Breast cancer is the most common malignancy overall, lung cancer is predominant in men, and breast cancer in women, while lymphoid leukemia is the leading pediatric cancer.[2,3]

GI cancers, comprising esophageal, gastric, colorectal, liver, biliary tract, pancreatic, small bowel, and anal cancers, represent a major health burden. Their proportional incidence has shifted due to improved surveillance and diagnostic precision.[3] Data from the National Cancer Registry Programme (NCRP), through Population and Hospital-Based Cancer Registries, provide valuable epidemiological insights, though coverage remains limited.[4]

Risk factors for GI cancers are multifactorial, encompassing lifestyle, environmental, infectious, and genetic determinants. Tobacco and alcohol markedly increase the risk of esophageal, gastric, liver, and pancreatic cancers. Diets rich in salt, red or processed meat, and pickled foods elevate risk, while fiber, fruits, and vegetables are protective. Helicobacter pylori is central to gastric carcinogenesis, and chronic hepatitis B and C infections are major contributors to hepatocellular carcinoma. Hereditary syndromes such as Lynch syndrome and familial adenomatous polyposis, along with chronic inflammatory states, further predispose individuals.[5]

Clinicopathological features integrate demographics, presentation, histology, and molecular markers.[6] GI cancers occur mainly after the age of 50, though aggressive histologies such as signet ring cell carcinoma may present earlier. Symptoms are site-specific, including dysphagia in esophageal cancer, early satiety in gastric cancer, jaundice in pancreatic and biliary malignancies, and altered bowel habits or anemia in colorectal cancers. Histological variation is also evident: squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus remains common in Asia, while adenocarcinoma is increasing in Western countries; gastric cancers are classified into intestinal and diffuse types; GI stromal tumors are KIT/DOG-1 positive; and colorectal adenocarcinoma remains a leading cause of mortality. Staging systems such as the American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging system (AJCCTNM) and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification guide management.[2-4,7]

In India, late-stage presentation is frequent, making tertiary care centers vital for diagnosis, management, and research. Robust data from these centers are essential to strengthen evidence-based strategies for prevention and early detection. The present study evaluates the demographic profile, histological patterns, and staging of GI cancers in a tertiary care setting to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of their epidemiology and to inform screening and management strategies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study site, design, and duration

This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Medical Oncology, National Institute of Medical Science and Research (NIMS) University, Jaipur, India, over a period of 2 years from January 2023 to December 2024. A total of 178 consecutive cases of GUI tract malignancies with relevant clinical features and histopathological confirmation were included.

Selection and description of participants

All patients with a histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of GI tract malignancy during the study period were eligible. Inclusion criteria were complete availability of clinical, imaging, and histopathological records. Patients with incomplete documentation or inconclusive biopsy results were excluded.

Data collection

A predesigned proforma was used to capture demographic details, clinical characteristics, tumor site, and histopathological findings. Medical records and hospital databases were reviewed, and extracted data were cross-verified independently by two investigators to ensure accuracy and minimize transcription errors.

Ethical considerations and patient consent

The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (2013 revision), Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines, and the standards of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). As this was a retrospective study utilizing anonymized patient records, the requirement for informed consent and ethical approval was formally waived off by the Institutional Ethics Committee of NIMS University, Jaipur, India. Patient anonymity and confidentiality were maintained throughout the study.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Categorical variables, including age groups and tumor sites, were presented as frequency and percentage [n (%)]. Cross-tabulation was performed to evaluate the distribution of tumor sites across different age categories, and percentages were calculated column-wise. Continuous variables, where applicable, were summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square tests for categorical variables, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Graphical representation and statistical analysis were carried out using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).

RESULTS

Distribution of GI malignancies

A total of 178 patients with GI tract malignancies were included. Biliary tract cancer (BTC) was the most frequent, representing 34.3% (n=61), followed by large intestine cancers (25.3%, n=45), esophageal cancer (15.2%, n=27), gastric cancer (10.1%, n=18), pancreatic cancer (9.0%, n=16), liver cancer (5.1%, n=9), and small intestinal cancer (1.1%, n=2). Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) tract cancers accounted for the largest subgroup, followed by lower and upper GI malignancies [Figure 1].

Distribution of gastrointestinal tract malignancies by site among study participants.
Figure 1:
Distribution of gastrointestinal tract malignancies by site among study participants.

Age distribution

The majority of patients were diagnosed in the 41–60 years (39.3%) and 61–80 years (42.7%) age groups. Younger patients were less common, with 11.8% between 21–40 years and only 3.4% below 20 years. Biliary tract cancer (BTC) predominated in patients aged 41–80 years, while large intestinal cancers were distributed across all age groups, peaking in middle age. Esophageal and pancreatic cancers also increased with advancing age [Table 1].

Table 1: Age-specific distribution of GI tract malignancies
Age group (years), n (%) Esophagus (n=27) Stomach (n=18) Small intestine (n=2) Liver
(n=9)
Pancreas (n=16) Biliary tract cancer (BTC) (n=61) Large intestine (n=45) Total (n=178)
0–20 0 (0.0) 2 (11.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (11.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 3 (6.7) 6 (3.4)
21–40 1 (3.7) 2 (11.1) 1 (50.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (12.5) 7 (11.5) 8 (17.8) 21 (11.8)
41–60 11 (40.7) 6 (33.3) 1 (50.0) 1 (11.1) 3 (18.8) 27 (44.3) 21 (46.7) 70 (39.3)
61–80 14 (51.9) 7 (38.9) 0 (0.0) 7 (77.8) 11 (68.8) 24 (39.3) 13 (28.9) 76 (42.7)
>81 1 (3.7) 1 (5.6) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 3 (4.9) 0 (0.0) 5 (2.8)

BTC: Biliary tract cancer; GI: Gastrointestinal; n: Number of cases. Percentages are shown as column percentages.

Gender distribution

Overall, males constituted 57.3% (n=102) and females 42.7% (n=76). Male predominance was observed in esophageal (74%), gastric (66.7%), pancreatic (81.3%), liver (55.6%), and large intestinal cancers (64.4%). Conversely, BTC showed female predominance (65.6%; 40/61 cases). Small intestinal cancers were equally distributed [Figure 2].

Gender wise patient distribution of gastrointestinal tract malignancies
Figure 2:
Gender wise patient distribution of gastrointestinal tract malignancies

Risk factors

Tobacco use (smoking/chewing) was reported in 58.4% (n=104), alcohol abuse in 45% (n=80), and obesity in 38% (n=68). Dietary risk factors (high salt and spice intake, pickled vegetables, hot beverages, red meat, and low fruit/vegetable consumption) were present in 52% (n=92). Chronic gallbladder, liver, or pancreatic diseases were observed in 16% (n=29), indicating multifactorial etiology.

Clinical presentation

The presenting symptoms varied by tumor site [Table 2]. Among upper GI malignancies (n=47), esophageal cancers most frequently presented with dysphagia (88.8%), weight loss (81.4%), and anorexia (44.4%). Gastric cancers were primarily characterized by abdominal pain (83.3%) and weight loss (77.7%), with vomiting (55.5%) and hematemesis (33.3%) also reported. Both small intestinal cancers manifested with abdominal pain and weight loss.

Table 2: Clinical presentation of patients with GI tract malignancies, upper GI malignancies (n=47)
Presentation,
n (%)
Esophagus n=27) Stomach (n=18) Small intestine (n=2)
Abdominal pain 6 (22.0) 15 (83.0) 2 (100.0)
Weight loss 22 (81.0) 14 (78.0) 2 (100.0)
Vomiting 6 (22.0) 10 (56.0) 1 (50.0)
Loss of appetite 12 (44.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (50.0)
Dysphagia 24 (89.0) 2 (11.0) 0 (0.0)
Hematemesis 1 (4.0) 6 (33.0) 0 (0.0)
Hepato-pancreato-biliary cancers (n=86)
Presentation, n (%) Pancreas (n=16) BTC (n=61) Liver (n=9)
Abdominal pain 14 (87.0) 55 (90.0) 4 (44.0)
Lump abdomen 8 (50.0) 34 (55.0) 2 (22.0)
Vomiting 9 (56.0) 40 (65.0) 1 (11.0)
Weight loss 9 (56.0) 52 (85.0) 4 (44.0)
Jaundice at presentation 5 (31.0) 12 (20.0) 1 (11.0)
Hematemesis 1 (6.0) 0 (0.0) 2 (22.0)
Lower GI malignancies (n=45)
Presentation, n (%) Colorectal (n=41) Anal canal (n=4)
Abdominal/local pain 36 (88.0) 4 (100.0)
Altered bowel habits 28 (68.0) 3 (75.0)
Rectal bleeding 14 (34.0) 4 (100.0)
Weight loss 16 (39.0) 2 (50.0)
Intestinal obstruction 18 (43.0) 1 (25.0)

BTC: Biliary tract cancer; n: number of cases; GI: gastrointestinal. Percentages are shown as row percentages.

In HPB malignancies (n=86), abdominal pain was the leading symptom (84.8%), followed by weight loss (75.6%), vomiting (58.1%), and palpable abdominal mass (51.1%); jaundice was observed in 20.9% of patients, while hematemesis occurred mainly in liver cancers due to portal hypertension. Lower GI malignancies (n=45) most often presented with abdominal or local pain, reported in nearly all cases of colorectal (87.8%) and anal canal cancers (100%). Altered bowel habits (68.3%) and intestinal obstruction (43.9%) were common in colorectal cancers, while rectal bleeding was seen in 34.1% of colorectal and all anal cancers.

Stage distribution

Most patients presented with advanced disease [Table 3]. In the upper GI tract, 78% of esophageal cancers were stage III/IV, and 77% of gastric cancers were stage IV, while both small intestinal cancers were advanced. In the HPB group, biliary tract cancers were predominantly stage IV (47%) or stage III (37%), and 87.5% of pancreatic cancers presented at stage IV. Among lower GI tract malignancies, 51% of colorectal cancers were diagnosed at stage IV and 35.5% at stage III, with all anal cancers presenting at advanced stages. Liver cancers, staged using the barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) system, included two intermediate, three advanced, and three terminal stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cases, along with one hepatoblastoma at PRETEXT stage IV. Overall, 57.9% of patients had localized disease, while 42.7% presented with metastasis, with pancreatic and biliary tract cancers showing the highest rates of advanced presentation [Figure 3].

Table 3: Stage-wise distribution of gastrointestinal tract malignancies
Stage, n (%) Esophagus (n=27) Number (Percentage) n (%) Stomach (n=18) Small intestine (n=2) Liver (n=9) BTC (n=61) Pancreas (n=16) Large intestine (n=45)
I 1 (3.7) 0 0 0 2 (3.3) 0 1 (2.2)
II 4 (14.8) 2 (11.1) 0 (0.0) 0 8 (13.1) 0 5 (11.1)
III 10 (37.0) 2 (11.1) 1 (50.0) 0 20 (32.8) 2 (12.5) 16 (35.6)
IV 11 (40.7) 14 (77.8) 1 (50.0) 0 28 (45.9) 14 (87.5) 23 (51.1)
PRETEXT IV 0 0 0 1 (11.1) 0 0 0
BCLC B 0 0 0 2 (22.2) 0 0 0
BCLC C 0 0 0 3 (33.3) 0 0 0
BCLC D 0 0 0 3 (33.3) 0 0 0
Localized 21 (77.8) 7 (38.9) 1 (50.0) 6 (66.7) 32 (52.5) 4 (25.0) 32 (71.1)
Metastatic 6 (22.2) 11 (61.1) 1 (50.0) 3 (33.3) 29 (47.5) 12 (75.0) 13 (28.9)

BTC: Biliary tract cancer; PRETEXT: Pretreatment extent of disease (pediatric liver cancer); BCLC: Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging; GI: Gastrointestinal

Metastatic distribution of gastrointestinal tract malignancies
Figure 3:
Metastatic distribution of gastrointestinal tract malignancies

Histopathological profile

Histological subtypes varied across sites [Table 4]. In the upper GI tract (n=47), esophageal cancers were predominantly squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n=21), mostly moderately differentiated (n=13), while gastric cancers were mainly adenocarcinomas, with moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (MD-AC) (n=8) and signet ring cell type (n=3) being common. Small intestinal tumors included one MD-AC and one neuroendocrine tumor, with rare cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and carcinoma NOS. In the HPB tract (n=77), adenocarcinoma was the dominant subtype (96%); BTC cases were largely MD-AC (n=34) or well differentiated adenocarcinoma (WD-AC) (n=16), pancreatic cancers were mostly adenocarcinoma with two mucinous variants, and liver cancers comprised eight hepatocellular carcinomas [Hepatitis B virus (HBV) = 4, Hepatitis C virus (HCV) = 1, seronegative = 3] and one hepatoblastoma (PRETEXT IV). In the lower GI tract (n=45), adenocarcinoma was the most frequent histology, with rectal cancers (53%) more common than colon cancers (38%). MD-AC predominated, followed by mucinous and signet ring subtypes, while all anal cancers (n=4) were SCC.

Table 4: Stage-wise distribution of gastrointestinal tract malignancies
Histopathology, n (%) Esophagus (n=27) Stomach (n=18) Small Intestine (n=2) Colon (n=17) Rectum (n=24) Anal Canal (n=4) Pancreas (n=16) BTC
(n=61)
Liver
n=9)
WD-SCC 8 (30%) 0 0 0 0 2 (50%) 0 0 0
MD-SCC 13 (48%) 0 0 0 0 1 (25%) 0 0 0
Adeno (MD) 3 (11%) 8 (44%) 1 (50%) 8 (47%) 12 (50%) 0 8 (50%) 34 (56%) 0
Adeno (WD) 0 1 (5%) 0 1 (6%) 4 (17%) 0 3 (19%) 16 (26%) 0
Adeno (Mucinous) 0 0 0 5 (29%) 6 (25%) 0 2 (12%) 0 0
Adeno (Signet ring) 0 3 (17%) 0 2 (12%) 1 (4%) 0 0 0 0
NET 0 0 1 (50%) 0 0 0 0 0 0
GIST 0 1 (5%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lymphoma 0 1 (5%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Carcinoma NOS 2 (7%) 1 (5%) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
HCC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 (89%)
Hepatoblastoma 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

SCC: Squamous cell carcinoma; WD: Well-differentiated; MD: Moderately differentiated; PD: Poorly differentiated; AC: Adenocarcinoma; UD: Undifferentiated; GIST: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; NET: Neuroendocrine tumor; DLBCL: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; NOS: Not otherwise specified; HCC: Hepatocellular carcinoma; BTC: Biliary tract cancer. Values are expressed as n (%)

DISCUSSION

This clinicopathological study of 178 patients with GI malignancies offers comprehensive insight into demographic trends, clinical presentations, histopathology, and stage distribution within a tertiary care setting in eastern Rajasthan. The increasing burden of GI cancers in India reflects population aging alongside lifestyle and dietary changes associated with urbanization, Westernized diets, and rising metabolic risk factors. Over the two-year study period, GI cancers accounted for 12.8% (178/1390) of all malignancies, consistent with prior Indian reports, including Sharma RG et al., with 14.4% incidence and NCRP 2012– 2016 reporting 11–15%.[8,9] Recent regional data, such as Thombare M et al., similarly confirm rising admissions for GI cancers in Indian tertiary centers, highlighting the growing oncological workload.[10]

The male-to-female ratio in this cohort was 1.3 : 1, slightly lower than previous reports in India of ~2.2 : 1 but is in line with other reports around ~1.5 : 1.[11,12] This trend suggests improved diagnostic access for women, heightened health awareness, and evolving risk exposures, including persistent tobacco use and metabolic disorders.

A key finding was the predominance of hepatobiliary cancers, comprising 34.3% (n=61), followed by colorectal (25.3%, n=45), esophageal (15.2%, n=27), gastric (10.1%, n=18), pancreatic (9.0%, n=16), liver (5.1%, n=9), and small bowel tumors (1.1%, n=2). This distribution underscores the regional epidemiology of GI cancers, with hepatobiliary malignancies disproportionately high in northern India, consistent with NCRP data and prior studies along the Ganga belt.[9,13]

Age distribution showed that most patients were between 41 and 60 years (39.3%) and 61 and 80 years (42.7%), with only 3.4% under 20 years and 11.8% between 21 and 40 years. These findings align with global trends in which GI cancer incidence peaks in older populations due to cumulative environmental exposures and comorbidities.[14,15] Early-onset GI cancers (<50 years) were observed in a minority, reflecting the need for region-specific screening strategies, as also noted by Danpanichkul P et al. (2025).[16]

Lifestyle and dietary factors were prominent contributors to disease burden: tobacco use was reported in 58.4%, alcohol consumption in 45%, obesity in 38%, and diets high in salt and spices and low in fruits and vegetables in 52% of patients. These results mirror Indian and global evidence identifying tobacco, alcohol, high-salt diets, and red meat consumption as significant risk factors for GI cancers, while fruit and vegetable intake provides a protective effect.[17-20] Chronic inflammatory and infectious conditions further contributed to oncogenesis, including gallstones (4–6× risk for gallbladder carcinoma), cirrhosis from HBV/HCV (15–20× risk for hepatocellular carcinoma), and chronic pancreatitis (2–5× risk for pancreatic cancer).[21-23] These findings highlight the multifactorial nature of GI malignancies, involving environmental, infectious, metabolic, and dietary determinants.

Clinically, site-specific symptom patterns were observed. Dysphagia, weight loss, and anorexia predominated in esophageal cancer; abdominal pain, vomiting, and GI bleeding were common in gastric and HPB tumors; and lower GI malignancies presented primarily with abdominal or local pain. Notably, 20% of esophageal cancer patients required enteral feeding access (feeding jejunostomy or PEG), reflecting delayed presentation and advanced disease at diagnosis.

Histopathological evaluation revealed adenocarcinoma as the dominant subtype (75.8%), with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) predominating in the esophagus (78%). Pancreatobiliary tumors were predominantly differentiated adenocarcinomas (96%), while colorectal cancers included a significant proportion of mucinous and signet-ring variants, associated with poor prognosis. Anal cancers were exclusively SCC, consistent with HPV-related pathogenesis.[24-31]

Stage at presentation was concerning: 42.7% of patients presented with metastatic disease, while only 57.9% had localized disease. Pancreatobiliary malignancies demonstrated particularly aggressive behavior with high metastatic rates. These findings are consistent with national and global reports showing late-stage presentation, particularly among populations with lower socioeconomic status, reflecting systemic delays in early detection, referral, and access to care.[32,33]

Despite certain limitations, including its single-center, hospital-based design, two-year retrospective duration, and potential reporting biases for lifestyle and dietary exposures, this study provides valuable insights into the epidemiology and clinicopathological patterns of GI cancers in eastern Rajasthan. Although the short study period may limit broader generalizability, the data capture critical trends, including a high prevalence of hepatobiliary malignancies, significant lifestyle-related risk factors, and advanced-stage presentation at diagnosis. These findings are both clinically and public health–relevant, underscoring the need for region-specific early detection strategies, targeted screening programs, and preventive interventions addressing modifiable risks such as tobacco use, alcohol consumption, obesity, and dietary habits. By delineating population- and region-specific patterns, this study lays the foundation for evidence-based public health initiatives and policy measures aimed at reducing the burden of GI cancers in India.

CONCLUSION

This study emphasizes the substantial burden of GI cancers in eastern Rajasthan, with hepatobiliary malignancies predominating and advanced-stage presentation common. Identification of lifestyle, dietary, and metabolic risk factors highlights opportunities for targeted preventive strategies. While single-center, retrospective limitations exist, these findings provide a foundation for larger, prospective studies aimed at improving early detection, risk stratification, and outcomes in the Indian context.

Acknowledgement:

The authors thank the Department of Medical Oncology, the hospital record section staff, and the Research and Innovation Cell of NIMS University for their support in data collection and facilitation of this study.

Author contributions:

BSC, GMB, RK, AC, CD, NB, and SD: All authors contributed to study design, data acquisition, analysis, and manuscript preparation. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethical approval:

The Institutional Review Board has waived the ethical approval for this study. Waiver number:EC/NEW/INST/2022/RJ/0118.

Declaration of patient consent:

Patient’s consent not required as patients’ identity is not disclosed or compromised

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil

References

  1. , . Planning for tomorrow: global cancer incidence and the role of prevention 2020-2070. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18:663-672.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:229-263.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , , , . Global burden of 5 major types of gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:335-349.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Cancer incidence estimates for 2022 and projection for 2025: Result from National Cancer Registry Programme, India. Indian J Med Res. 2022;156:598-607.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Systemic diseases and gastrointestinal cancer risk. J Cancer Allied Spec. 2023;9:473.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Clinicopathological study of gastrointestinal tract tumours. Indian J Pathol Res Pract. 2017;6:413-418.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , , , , et al. The eighth edition AJCC cancer staging manual: Continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more personalized approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:93-99.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , . Clinico-pathological and epidemiological study of gallbladder cancer with special reference to gastrointestinal malignancies in Eastern Rajasthan region. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:15662.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Descriptive epidemiology of gastrointestinal cancers: Results from National Cancer Registry Programme, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022;23:409-418.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , , et al. Admission pattern of gastrointestinal cancer for 2020-2023 from a single tertiary care hospital in Pune, Western Maharashtra. Cureus. 2024;16:e67248.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , , . Gastric cancer-A clinicopathological study in a tertiary care centre of North-eastern India. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 2014;5:142.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , . Histopathology of gastrointestinal tract malignancies-A two year retrospective study. Annals of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2017;4:A374-378.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , . Epidemiology of gallbladder cancer in India. Chinese Clinical Oncology. 2019;8:33.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . Burden of gastrointestinal cancers in Asia, 1990-2019. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025;25:232.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , . Systematic review with meta-analysis: Age-related malignancy detection rates at upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020;13:1756284820959225.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , , , et al. Early-onset gastrointestinal cancers and metabolic risk factors: Global trends from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Mayo Clin Proc. 2025;100:1159-1171.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , , , , , et al. Dietary risk factors in gastrointestinal cancers: A case-control study in North India. J Cancer Res Ther. 2023;19:1385-1391.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , , , . Risk factors for colorectal cancer in Goa, India: A hospital-based case-control study. Indian J Community Med. 2021;46:474-478.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , , , et al. Diet and risk of gastric cancer: An umbrella review. Nutrients. 2022;14:1764.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , , , , et al. A pooled analysis of 14 cohort studies of anthropometric factors and pancreatic cancer risk. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:1708-1717.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , . Gallstones and risk of gallbladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1985;75:77-80.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. . Changing etiology and epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: Asia and worldwide. J Liver Cancer. 2024;24:62-70.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Pancreatic cancer in chronic pancreatitis; aetiology, incidence, and early detection. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;24:349-358.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . Clinicopathological profile of gastric cancer in India: An institutional experience. South Asian J Cancer. 2020;9:14-19.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. , , , . Epidemiologic study of patients registered in oncology unit at a hepatobiliary tertiary care center in India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2020;41:358-367.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , , et al. Colorectal cancer in India: An audit from a tertiary center in a low prevalence area. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2017;8:484-490.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , , , , et al. Clinicopathological profile of colorectal cancer in Kashmir. Clin Surg. 2019;4:2368.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , . Demographic trends in carcinoma esophagus from India along with a brief comparative review of the global trends. South Asian J Cancer. 2020;9:163-167.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Surgery for pancreatic carcinoma: state of the art. Indian J Surg. 2012;74:79-86.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , , , . Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinoma: clinical pathology and treatment options. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2019;39:13.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. . Anal carcinoma: exploring the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. World J Exp Med. 2024;14:98525.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , , , , , . The influence of socioeconomic status on esophageal cancer in Taiwan: a population-based study. J Pers Med. 2022;12:595.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , , , , , et al. Management of colon cancer at a tertiary referral center in India: patterns of presentation, treatment, and survival outcomes. Indian J Cancer. 2019;56:297-301.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections